Grading for equity : what it is, why it matters, and how it can transform schools and classrooms / Joe Feldman.

By: Feldman, Joe [author.]
Publisher: Thousand Oaks, California : Corwin, a SAGE Publishing Company, c2019Description: xxviii, 266 pages : illustrations (some color)Content type: text Media type: unmediated Carrier type: volumeISBN: 9781506391571 (pbk. : alk. paper)Subject(s): Grading and marking (Students) -- United States | Discrimination in education -- United States | Minority students -- Rating of -- United States | Educational equalization -- United StatesDDC classification: Grad 371.26013 LOC classification: LB3051 | .F44 2019Summary: "For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, "participation", and "effort"), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"-- Provided by publisher.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Item type Current location Home library Collection Call number Vol info Status Date due Barcode Item holds
CIRCULATION BOOK GRADUATE LIBRARY
GRADUATE LIBRARY
CIRCULATION SECTION
NON-FICTION Grad 371.26013 F312 2019 (Browse shelf) 10244 Available 10244
Total holds: 0

Includes bibliographical references and index.

"For some time, traditional (A - F) grading practices have been under fire from a wide range of stakeholder. Grading policies are wildly inconsistent from classroom to classroom, frequently misguided, uninformed, and frequently based on subjective judgments. Of even more concern, our grading practices exacerbate the achievement gap. It is well-documented that African-American and Latino students, boys, as well as special education students, are disproportionately suspended and expelled, influenced by teachers' unconscious but biased judgments of student behavior. Virtually ignored is how teachers' incorporate subjective and non-academic criteria into their grades (through criteria such as student attitude, "participation", and "effort"), and how approach to grading contributes to these same students' disproportionately high course failure rates and disproportionately low placement in advanced academic tracks"-- Provided by publisher.

There are no comments for this item.

to post a comment.